Showing posts with label Joe Biden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe Biden. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

The Violence Against Women Act: Thanks, Joe...

When it comes to women's rights in this election, only one ticket measures up: Obama/Biden.

Here is a recent statement by Women for Obama:
Senator Biden will hold a conference call with 500 advocates and victims who are activists against violence against women to announce the 2 millionth call to the Domestic Violence Hotline that he helped create this afternoon.

Approximately 1,400 women a year – four every day – die in the United States as a result of domestic violence. And 132,000 women report that they have been victims of a rape or attempted rape, and it is estimated that an even greater number have been raped, but do not report it.

Biden wrote and passed the landmark Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which is the strongest legislation to date that criminalizes domestic violence and other forms of violence against women, provides victims with the support they deserve, and holds batterers accountable. Signed into law in 1994, the bill funds and helps communities, nonprofit organizations, and police combat domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking.

VAWA establishes a sexual assault services program and provides education grants to prevent domestic violence. Since VAWA was enacted, over 2,500 separate shelters, centers, and outreach offices have been established and the National Domestic Violence Hotline has received over 2 million calls. Shining a spotlight on this violence has resulted both in better supports for victims, and lowering the incident rate of domestic violence by 60%.

Barack Obama and Joe Biden will make ending violence against women and children a White House priority.

Chelsea Wilson was abused and because of the Violence Against Women Act, she was able to make sure that her abuser went to jail for 25 years. She now feels safe and can take care of her son without worrying about being attacked again. She shares her story in the video below...



Hotline advocates are available for victims and anyone calling on their behalf to provide crisis intervention, safety planning, information and referrals to agencies in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. If you or someone you know is frightened about something in your relationship, please call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-SAFE (7233) or TTY 1-800-787-3224. For more information visit www.ndvh.org.

Friday, October 03, 2008

VEEP Debate Scorecard

My quick take on VP debate (click graphic on the right to enlarge):

Governor Palin surpassed the abysmal expectations after the Couric debacle, but was too canned and at times, I thought, disrespectful to Senator Biden/Obama in her tone and attitude. Some call her "spunky," but I found her a bit arrogant and lecturing last night, as well as incredibly fake. While she can clearly deliver a talking point, she obviously does not have a solid or deep grasp of the issues, particularly when forced to think on her feet beyond the talking points and memorized lines. The weirdest part of the debate was when she would simply ignore a question and blatantly jump to some other, unrelated, talking point she had memorized or had on notes in front of her. Really strange. And some of her mannerisms, like winking at the camera, were laughable, I thought, and not exactly presidential. The most interesting thing, from my vantage, about Palin was the decision to speak directly to the camera for most of the debate and to play up - ad nauseum - her "Jow Six Pack-ness." It was probably a good decision, given the alternatives. Yet, I found the "you betcha's" a bit annoying after awhile and not exactly what I am looking for from a VP, let alone a President. Can you actually imagine her sitting across the table with an ally or enemy trying to negotiate an arms deal, a peace treaty, a global warming agreement, etc? I can't either... Palin apparently won some likability points in post-debate polls on this "folksy" approach, but I don't see it making much of a difference in the election. This isn't 2004. I think issues matter more than this personality stuff. But, again, she exceeded expectations, went toe-to-toe with Biden a few times and avoided an obvious major gaffe, so she and the McCain campaign are probably ok with the result, though now that more scrutiny is being given to some of her answers, more criticism is emerging. But, hey, she is playing wth a pretty weak hand on the substance and that is on McCain.

As for Biden, I thought he also avoided the obvious pitfalls and was really quite masterful on a lot of the policy issues. He wasn't patronizing, arrogant or condescending at all and didn't prattle on as he is prone to do. He was forceful and passionate, serious-minded and learned throughout. And, he was human at the end when discussing his family. In some ways, Biden was the straight man to Palin. Most, I am sure, tuned in to see her, not him. As such, she dominated "the spotlight," but, Biden acquitted himself very well, overall, I thought. Clearly, on the substance and issues, he is in a different league altogether than Palin. This guy can clearly step in and be president. It was wise to avoid direct engagement with Palin's silly record and recent foibles and to focus instead on McCain's record and positions. He was very effective and really devastating at several points and this is where and why I think he "won" the debate. The election is ultimately about Obama and McCain and this debate did absolutely nothing to change the reality that McCain is simply and demonstrably on the wrong side of every major issue in this election. I particularly liked some of his comebacks. For instance, when she accused Obama of raising taxes, Biden came back well with a discussion of "fairness" in the tax system. When she attempted to attack on foreign policy, he had perhaps his most powerful response which was to say that he saw no evidence to date that McCain's policies were any different than Bush on a host of issues. And, when she mentioned McCain's $5,000 health care rebate to citizens, Biden's retort was devastating, pointing out that to fund that, McCain will TAX everyone's health benefits and that, in the end, some 20 million Americans will replace a $12,000 health plan with a one-time $5,000 check! Very good stuff, to the point and effective.

So, for those of you scoring at home, here is my card:

- nominal win for Palin in that she did not crash and burn and was a hell of a lot clearer articulating the Right position than the guy at the top of her ticket. Exceeding terrible expectations is a victory, of sorts.

- win for Biden for the reasons above

- win for Obama in that Biden was excellent on the issues and in nailing McCain and Palin did absolutely nothing to change the core of this campaign, which is about the real issues facing our nation and the world.

- Thus, this has to be seen, in the long run, as a loss for McCain. The whole Palin pick was, like so many other desperate moves he's made recently, a stunt. He got his initial burst from it, but now that people know who she is and what she is about, she is sinking fast. Last night stopped the bleeding from the Couric embarrassment, but didn't really change anything major. Clearly, McCain himself does not have the issues on his side, nor does he have the political skill to defeat Obama on his own. Thus, he needs one of these stunts to be the "game-changer" he must have to get back in this race, let alone win. This VP debate was one MAJOR opportunity that might have done that, but clearly did not. So, it is a loss for McCain, in my book.

If you go around the web and look at the initial reaction from viewers and in the first wave of polls, Biden clearly won. As I wrote, Palin's "likability" numbers went up, but Biden's command of the issues won the day with many more viewers and more people said they were more likely to vote Dem afterward than vice versa.

What did you think?

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

The Most Challenging Question for Palin and Biden

This is an interesting post by William Saletan over at the Slate blog, Human Nature:

Tomorrow night, Joe Biden and Sarah Palin will meet in their only vice-presidential debate. Most of the discussion will be about economics and foreign policy. On the social issues, here are two questions moderator Gwen Ifill should ask.

Gov. Palin, you were asked this week whether it should be illegal for a girl to get an abortion in the case of rape or incest. Your answer was that the girl herself should not go to jail. What about the doctor? Should the doctor who performs that abortion face criminal penalties?


Sen. Biden, you said four weeks ago that you believe life begins at conception but that you can't impose your personal beliefs on other people. Yet you also voted for a law against gay marriage called the Defense of Marriage Act, and two years ago, you said this law expresses your view that "marriage is between a man and a woman and states must respect that." Why is it OK to impose your beliefs on gay marriage but not on abortion?


Here's all the background information Ifill will need when the candidates start fudging...

Palin's interview with Katie Couric, aired yesterday:

Couric: "If a 15-year-old is raped by her father, you believe it should be illegal for her to get an abortion. Why?"

Palin:"I am pro-life. And I'm unapologetic about my position there on pro-life. And I understand good people on both sides of the abortion debate. In fact, good people in my own family have differing views on abortion and when it should be allowed. So ... I respect people's opinion on this. ..."

Couric: "But, ideally, you think it should be illegal for a girl who was raped or the victim of incest to get an abortion? "

Palin: "I'm saying that, personally, I would counsel the person to choose life, despite horrific, horrific circumstances that this person would find themselves in. And, um, if you're asking, though, kind of foundationally here, should anyone end up in jail for having an ... abortion, absolutely not."

Biden on Meet the Press, Sept. 7, 2008:

Biden: "I'm prepared as a matter of faith to accept that life begins at the moment of conception. But that is my judgment. For me to impose that judgment on everyone else who is equally and maybe even more devout than I am seems to me is inappropriate in a pluralistic society. ..."

Tom Brokaw: "But if you, you believe that life begins at conception, and you've also voted for abortion rights."

Biden: "No, what [I] voted against curtailing the right, criminalizing abortion. I voted against telling everyone else in the country that they have to accept my religiously based view that it's a moment of conception."

Biden's recorded vote for DOMA, Sept. 10, 1996.

Biden on Meet the Press, June 4, 2006:

"We already have a law, the Defense of Marriage Act. We've all voted—not, where I've voted, and others have said, look, marriage is between a man and a woman and states must respect that. Nobody's violated that law, there's been no challenge to that law."

Biden on CNN, June 5, 2006:

"We have already passed a law saying that—and the Defense of Marriage Act, defining marriage between a man and a woman."

The Biden campaign's evasive response to a same-sex marriage question on the Human Rights Campaign's 2007 survey of presidential candidates:

"Senator Biden supports letting states determine how to recognize civil unions and how to define marriage. He believes that legal recognition should not be denied to same-sex couples."

Bonus peg: Biden will speak at HRC's annual dinner Saturday night.

All yours, Gwen. Go for it.

What do you think? What question would you ask the vice-presidential candidates?